0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÏ°³ °£È£´ëÇÐÀÇ ÀçÇлý°ú ±³¼öÀÚÀÇ ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ½Ç½À±³À°¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇöȲ°ú ¿ä±¸µµ

The Current Status and Needs for Simulation-Based Education in Nursing Students and Instructors

ÀüÀΰ£È£°úÇÐÇмúÁö 2018³â 11±Ç 1È£ p.10 ~ 19
KMID : 1150520180110010010
¹ÚÁ¤¼÷ ( Park Jung-Suk ) - °í½Å´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

±è°æ¹Ì ( Kim Kyoung-Mi ) - °í½Å´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¼ÕÇý°æ ( Son Hye-Gyeong ) - °í½Å´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
Á¶ÇåÇÏ ( Cho Hun-Ha ) - °í½Å´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: This study was done th identify the experiences of current status and needs of simulation-based education in nursing students and instructors.

Methods: A descriptive research was used and data were collected in 2018. Participants were 106 nursing students and 14 instructors at a university located in B Metropolitan City. Data analysis was performed using SPSS/WIN 18.0.

Results: In the satisfaction of the simulation-based education in nursing students, 76% answered ¡®satisfaction¡¯, in the satisfaction with clinical practice after the simulation-based education, 80% answered ¡®satisfaction.¡¯ There were simulation-based educational needs for various subjects in the order of Adult nursing 35.2%, maternal nursing 20.4%, child nursing 14.1%, psychiatric mental nursing 13.4%, nursing management 7.0%, fundamentals of nursing 6.4% and community health nursing 3.5%. The instructor¡¯s hope degree for simulation education, 66.7% of the instructors wanted simulation training, the desired area of simulation training is simulation design courses 46.6%, debriefing 26.7%, and standardized patient training programs 13.3%.

Conclusion: This study has significant implications for understanding the current status and needs for simulation-based education in nursing students and instructors. Its results can be used as the foundation and basis for the improving of ability in practical nursing.
KeyWords

Current status, Needs, Simulation-based education, Nursing students, Instructors
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸